नारायण मूर्ति के 70 घंटे काम के आह्वान पर संसद में बहस, सरकार ने नहीं किया समर्थन।

Parliament Echoes with Narayana Murthy's 70-Hour Workweek Advocacy - Government Responds to the Stir, Unveiling Perspectives on Work-Life Dynamics.

In July 2020, Narayana Murthy, the co-founder of Infosys, an Indian multinational information technology company, sparked a nationwide debate by suggesting that Indian youth should work for 70 hours a week to boost India's productivity and economic growth. His comments, made during an interview with an Indian news channel, quickly gained traction and generated mixed reactions.

Proponents of Murthy's proposal argue that longer working hours are essential for India to compete with developed nations, particularly in the manufacturing and technology sectors. They point to countries like China and South Korea, where long working hours are often associated with high levels of productivity and economic success.

Opponents of the proposal, however, raise concerns about the impact of such long working hours on employees' health, well-being, and personal lives. They argue that excessive work hours can lead to increased stress, burnout, and physical health problems. They also emphasize the importance of work-life balance and the need for adequate leisure time for personal development and family responsibilities.

The debate over Murthy's proposal highlights the complex relationship between working hours, productivity, and individual well-being. While longer working hours may lead to increased output in the short term, the long-term consequences on employees' health and overall quality of life cannot be ignored.

In India, the standard working hours are typically 48 hours per week, with a maximum limit of 54 hours per week. However, many employees, particularly in the information technology and services sectors, work overtime regularly, often exceeding the legal limits.

The Indian government has taken some steps to address concerns about long working hours. In 2018, the government amended the Factories Act to mandate a 30-minute meal break for all employees working more than 6 hours per day. However, there is still much room for improvement in enforcing labour laws and promoting a healthy work-life balance.

The debate over Murthy's proposal is not unique to India. Similar discussions have taken place in other countries, including the United States, where the concept of a "40-hour workweek" has been challenged by some who argue that it is outdated and no longer aligned with the demands of the modern economy.

The future of work is likely to involve a more flexible and individualized approach to working hours. Technology has enabled remote work and flexible schedules, and companies are increasingly recognizing the benefits of a healthy work-life balance for their employees' well-being and productivity.

Ultimately, the question of how many hours Indian youth should work is not a simple one. It is a complex issue that must be considered in the context of India's unique economic, social, and cultural landscape. The focus should be on finding a balance between productivity and well-being, ensuring that employees can contribute to India's economic growth while also maintaining their health and personal lives.