We Will Rip You Apart": Supreme Court To Authorities In Patanjali Ads Case
Supreme Court rejects Patanjali founders' apologies for misleading ads, criticizes Uttarakhand licensing authority, demands accountability.
In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has firmly rejected the apologies submitted by Patanjali founders Ramdev and Balkrishna for their company's misleading advertisements. The court, displaying no leniency, stated, "We are not blind" and expressed dissatisfaction with the apologies, deeming them mere lip service. Justices Hima Kohli and A Amanullah presiding over the bench criticized the Uttarakhand licensing authority for its inaction against Patanjali and questioned the government's response to the matter.
The bench highlighted that the apologies were initially sent to the media before reaching the court, indicating a preference for publicity over genuine contrition. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing the Patanjali founders, faced scrutiny from the court for the drafted apologies, with Justice Amanullah questioning their sincerity.
The court emphasized that mere apologies are insufficient, stressing the need for accountability and adherence to court orders. It underscored the broader issue of law violations and societal impact beyond a single FMCG company's conduct.
Notably, the court admonished the Uttarakhand government for its lax enforcement, demanding the immediate suspension of three officers and condemning their negligence. It accused the licensing authority of colluding with Patanjali, lamenting the mockery made of the judicial system.
Addressing the seriousness of the matter, the court pointed out the potential harm caused to consumers of Patanjali products and urged swift action from the authorities.
In a scathing remark, the court highlighted attempts by Ramdev and Balkrishna to avoid appearing in court, suggesting evasion of responsibility.
The proceedings revealed the glaring failure of the state licensing authority to regulate Patanjali's misleading advertisements, prompting the court to demand accountability and corrective action.
Overall, the Supreme Court's stance underscores the imperative of upholding legal standards and protecting consumers' interests against corporate misconduct.
| Follow the Hindeez on Google News |  |
| Follow the Hindeez channel on WhatsApp |  |
We hate spam as much as you do
© Hindeez 2024, All Rights Reserved
